Massachusetts Bankruptcy Law Firm
Massachusetts Bankruptcy Attorney Attorney Profile Frequently Asked Questions Free Case Evaluation Contact Us
Bankruptcy
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
Chapter 7
Bankruptcy Mistakes
Bankruptcy Myths
Consumer Protection
Cram Down
Credit Card Debt
Credit Reports/Scores
Debt Collection Defense
Debt Settlement
Discharging Your Debt
Do I qualify?
Exemptions
Foreclosure
Large Business Bankruptcy
Life after Bankruptcy
Loan Modification
Newsletter Archives
NOLO Bankruptcy Articles
Relief from Tax Liens
Self-Employed Bankruptcy
Small Business Bankruptcy
The Process
Wage Garnishment
Warning Signs
Why Hire an Attorney?
Will I Lose My Home?
Newsletter Archives
Nolo Bankruptcy Articles
For tax related situations, visit our tax resolution website.
Phone:
--
For information on our other legal services, click here
How Can Bankruptcy Help Me? Schedule Your Appointment Now! Visit Our Bankruptcy Blog

Eighth Circuit BAP Allows Strip Off of Wholly Unsecured Lien in Chapter 20

Eighth Circuit BAP Allows Strip Off of Wholly Unsecured Lien in Chapter 20

The Eighth Circuit BAP found that a chapter 13 debtor may strip off a wholly unsecured lien on his principal residence even where the debtor is otherwise not entitled to discharge.In re Fisette,11-6012 (B.A.P. 8th Cir., August 29, 2011). In so holding the court joined the majority of Circuit and BAP courts that have held that the reasoning in Nobelman v. Am. Savings Bank, 508 U.S. 324 (1993) establishes the right to strip off wholly unsecured residential liens. Turning to the issue of whether ineligibility for discharge under section 1328(f)(1) precludes the otherwise permissible lien stripping, the court stated: "We hold that the strip off of a wholly unsecured lien on a debtor's principal residence is effective upon completion of the debtor's obligations under his plan, and it is not contingent on his receipt of a Chapter 13 discharge." Unlike the courts that have found that section 1325(a)(5) precludes lien-stripping in a chapter 20, the Fisette court found that, pursuant to the statutory language, the requirements of section 1325(a)(5) were not applicable to a lien which was unsecured. The court concluded its analysis with a finding that the creditors whose liens were stripped would be entitled to distribution of the estate along with the other unsecured creditors.

Tara Twomey of the Amicus Project assisted in writing debtor's brief.

This article is provided by the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Lawyers, please visit them at www.NACBA.org

Read More Blog Posts
72 Shrewsbury Street, Worcester, MA 01604
Visit Our Video Vault Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Social Networking