Massachusetts Bankruptcy Law Firm
Massachusetts Bankruptcy Attorney Attorney Profile Frequently Asked Questions Free Case Evaluation Contact Us
Bankruptcy
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
Chapter 7
Bankruptcy Mistakes
Bankruptcy Myths
Consumer Protection
Cram Down
Credit Card Debt
Credit Reports/Scores
Debt Collection Defense
Debt Settlement
Discharging Your Debt
Do I qualify?
Exemptions
Foreclosure
Large Business Bankruptcy
Life after Bankruptcy
Loan Modification
Newsletter Archives
NOLO Bankruptcy Articles
Relief from Tax Liens
Self-Employed Bankruptcy
Small Business Bankruptcy
The Process
Wage Garnishment
Warning Signs
Why Hire an Attorney?
Will I Lose My Home?
Newsletter Archives
Nolo Bankruptcy Articles
For tax related situations, visit our tax resolution website.
Phone:
--
For information on our other legal services, click here
How Can Bankruptcy Help Me? Schedule Your Appointment Now! Visit Our Bankruptcy Blog

"Supreme Court Accepts Case Challenging Mortgage Fees Charged by Quicken Loans"

"Supreme Court Accepts Case Challenging Mortgage Fees Charged by Quicken Loans"

"Updated: The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether federal law bars mortgage lenders from charging "unearned fees" at closings if they aren't part of a kickback or fee-sharing arrangement.

The federal government supports the plaintiffs, who claim Quicken Loans Inc. charges unearned fees in violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, report the Wall Street Journal's Developments blog, SCOTUSblog and Courthouse News Service. The plaintiffs claimed they were charged loan-discount fees, but their interest rates were not reduced. The Supreme Court granted cert Tuesday.

The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last year that the law bars lenders and other service providers from paying or receiving kickbacks, but it doesn’t bar unearned fees charged by a single party, according to the Wall Street Journal. For its part, Quicken denies that its fees were unearned or illegal.

"It is undisputed that the loan discount points collected in this case were earned and resulted in a lower interest rate for the borrowers," Quicken says in a statement provided to the ABA Journal. "Any implication to the contrary is pure fantasy and has been manufactured by certain plaintiff law firms, attempting to twist and manipulate facts to serve their own financial interests."

The case, Freeman v. Quicken Loans Inc., is a consolidation of suits by three couples who obtained mortgages from Quicken in 2007. SCOTUSblog links to the cert petition (PDF)."

This article is brought to you by the American Bar Association. For the full article please visit:

http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/supreme_court_accepts_case_challenging_mortgage_fees_quicken_loans/?utm_source=maestro&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=weekly_email

Categories: Mortgage
Read More Blog Posts
72 Shrewsbury Street, Worcester, MA 01604
Visit Our Video Vault Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Social Networking